Australia Prioritizes Onshore Skilled Migrants, Aims for 'Cosmetic' Migration Cut Amid Criticism

Australia is now prioritizing onshore skilled migrants for permanent residency, a move Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke states will manage the country's temporary visa population and 'cosmetically' reduce net overseas migration, though the shift faces scrutiny for lack of transparency.

Subscribe to newsletter

The Australian government has quietly enacted a new ministerial direction prioritizing skilled migrants already within the country for permanent residency. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke issued the directive last month, signaling a significant shift in immigration policy. This move is designed to manage Australia's substantial temporary visa population, which includes many Filipino workers who aspire to permanent residency, and to address political pressure to reduce net overseas migration (NOM).

Under the revised policy, 70% of the 185,000 permanent migration places outlined in the May budget are now reserved for onshore applicants. Experts note that this approach will 'cosmetically' reduce NOM figures by converting individuals already counted in Australia's population from temporary to permanent status, rather than adding new arrivals from overseas. Currently, Australia's temporary visa population stands at approximately 3 million people, with a record 432,300 individuals holding bridging visas as of August 2026.

According to Alan Gamlen, director of the ANU Migration Hub, prioritizing the conversion of temporary visas to permanent status is a key strategy for the government to tackle the backlog of temporary visas. While acknowledging that processing bottlenecks remain, Dr. Gamlen indicated that this directive helps address the challenges posed by the 'oversized temporary migrant population' that grew particularly after the COVID-19 pandemic. Former Department of Immigration deputy secretary Abul Rizvi, however, suggested that while the change contributes to reducing the number of long-term temporary residents, its impact on reaching the 225,000 NOM target would be modest.

The government's handling of these changes has not been without controversy. Shadow Home Affairs and Immigration Minister Jonno Duniam criticized the lack of public announcement and consultation, accusing the government of managing 'migration by stealth.' Senator Duniam argued that merely reordering the processing queue would not meaningfully resolve existing backlogs, issues of 'visa hopping,' or administrative inefficiencies, highlighting concerns about transparency.

Both migration experts consulted by ABC News emphasized the importance of the government proactively explaining these policy shifts to the public. Dr. Gamlen warned that a 'fact void' around migration issues could lead to misinformation and misunderstandings, fostering a perception that migration is uncontrolled. For Filipino temporary visa holders in Australia, this prioritization provides a clearer pathway to permanent residency, although the broader debate underscores the need for clear communication from authorities regarding future migration settings.